40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.21%
Similar revenue growth to CRK's 15.74%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
39.02%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRK's 22.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-11.05%
Gross profit decline while CRK shows 13.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-20.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.17%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.90%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
18.76%
Total costs growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.36%
D&A growth above 1.5x CRK's 2.64%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-5.71%
EBITDA decline while CRK shows 63.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.97%
EBITDA margin decline while CRK shows 89.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.02%
Operating income decline while CRK shows 53.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.70%
Operating margin decline while CRK shows 32.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-292.33%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-56.11%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-245.23%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-18.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.67%
EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.51%
Diluted EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.18%
Share count reduction while CRK shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-3.90%
Diluted share reduction while CRK shows 5.10% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.