40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.59%
Revenue decline while CRK shows 9.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-18.86%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
14.76%
Similar gross profit growth to CRK's 16.83%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
20.28%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CRK's 6.73%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.38%
Other expenses growth less than half of CRK's 516.49%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-3.79%
Operating expenses reduction while CRK shows 2826.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.48%
Total costs reduction while CRK shows 113.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.57%
D&A growth while CRK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.76%
EBITDA growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.17%
EBITDA margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
53.69%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x CRK's 30.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
61.07%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x CRK's 19.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
26.97%
Other expenses growth less than half of CRK's 82.63%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
100.09%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CRK's 74684.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
109.71%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRK's 68222.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
247.44%
Tax expense growth less than half of CRK's 74900.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-13.75%
Net income decline while CRK shows 74564.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.61%
Net margin decline while CRK shows 68112.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.92%
EPS decline while CRK shows 74224.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.26%
Diluted EPS decline while CRK shows 74185.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.01%
Share count reduction while CRK shows 0.79% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-24.17%
Diluted share reduction while CRK shows 1.58% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.