40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.73%
Revenue decline while CRK shows 17.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.29%
Cost reduction while CRK shows 74.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.23%
Gross profit decline while CRK shows 2.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.66%
Margin expansion while CRK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.76%
Other expenses reduction while CRK shows 16.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
12.80%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of CRK's 18.19%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-1.72%
Total costs reduction while CRK shows 42.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.86%
D&A reduction while CRK shows 30.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
17.56%
EBITDA growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-39.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.22%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-152.54%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
20.30%
Pre-tax income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.26%
Pre-tax margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-45.10%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
56.92%
Net income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
73.83%
Net margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.82%
EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
55.15%
Diluted EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.30%
Share count reduction below 50% of CRK's 0.27%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.15%
Diluted share increase while CRK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.