40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.24%
Revenue decline while CRK shows 24.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-23.67%
Cost reduction while CRK shows 21.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
31.24%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x CRK's 25.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
37.04%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CRK's 0.76%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
710.60%
Other expenses growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
345.38%
Operating expenses growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.07%
Total costs growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.22%
D&A growth above 1.5x CRK's 48.57%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-21.56%
EBITDA decline while CRK shows 222.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.60%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of CRK's 166.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-45.79%
Operating income decline while CRK shows 692.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-43.39%
Operating margin decline while CRK shows 535.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-961.59%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-110.35%
Pre-tax income decline while CRK shows 0.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-110.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-111.75%
Tax expense reduction while CRK shows 0.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-101.74%
Net income decline while CRK shows 0.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.90%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.81%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.67%
Share count reduction while CRK shows 1.52% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-5.89%
Diluted share reduction while CRK shows 6.73% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
