40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.06%
Revenue growth below 50% of CRK's 100.17%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-6.05%
Cost reduction while CRK shows 164.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
8.02%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRK's 83.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.82%
Margin expansion while CRK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.43%
Other expenses growth less than half of CRK's 66.15%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.86%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRK's 65.25%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.25%
Total costs reduction while CRK shows 96.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.13%
D&A growth less than half of CRK's 328.52%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
8.16%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CRK's 90.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-12.23%
EBITDA margin decline while CRK shows 30.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
32.10%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRK's 101.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.17%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x CRK's 0.49%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
73.99%
Similar other expenses growth to CRK's 74.48%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
17.01%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CRK's 50.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.54%
Pre-tax margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
772.34%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CRK's 54.74%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-37.05%
Net income decline while CRK shows 9.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.36%
EPS decline while CRK shows 8.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-35.27%
Diluted EPS decline while CRK shows 11.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.40%
Share count reduction while CRK shows 0.39% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.46%
Diluted share reduction while CRK shows 0.07% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.