40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.68%
Positive growth while CRK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
37.03%
Cost increase while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-15.05%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.46%
Margin decline while CRK shows 1.89% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.15%
Other expenses reduction while CRK shows 2.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.25%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRK's 5.16%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
21.47%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRK's 0.08%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.52%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-17.05%
EBITDA decline while CRK shows 7.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
32.12%
EBITDA margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-50.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-51.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-95.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-48.11%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.35%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-51.59%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-52.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.72%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.93%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.56%
Share count reduction below 50% of CRK's 0.60%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
9.59%
Diluted share increase while CRK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.