PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
40.22%
Positive growth while CRK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.84%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRK's 4.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
145.91%
Positive growth while CRK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
75.38%
Margin expansion while CRK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.37%
G&A growth while CRK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.12%
Other expenses reduction while CRK shows 11.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.24%
Operating expenses reduction while CRK shows 12.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.25%
Total costs growth less than half of CRK's 10.90%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.70%
Interest expense reduction while CRK shows 20.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.24%
D&A reduction while CRK shows 10.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
111.24%
EBITDA growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
285.95%
EBITDA margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
94.03%
Operating income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
95.74%
Operating margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-612.07%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
42.50%
Pre-tax income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.99%
Pre-tax margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.59%
Tax expense growth while CRK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.06%
Net income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.14%
Net margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.00%
EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.00%
Diluted EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.03%
Share count reduction while CRK shows 0.04% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.