40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
56.59%
Positive growth while CRK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-12.93%
Cost reduction while CRK shows 374.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
169.31%
Positive growth while CRK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
71.99%
Margin expansion while CRK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.82%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.33%
Other expenses growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.35%
Operating expenses growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.41%
Total costs reduction while CRK shows 37.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.08%
Interest expense growth less than half of CRK's 9.92%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.55%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
208.30%
EBITDA growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
102.93%
EBITDA margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
346.02%
Operating income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
257.12%
Operating margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.72%
Other expenses growth less than half of CRK's 125.77%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
86.38%
Pre-tax income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
91.30%
Pre-tax margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
71.06%
Tax expense growth while CRK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
93.57%
Net income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
95.89%
Net margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
93.61%
EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
93.61%
Diluted EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.03%
Share count reduction below 50% of CRK's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.