40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.36%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-13.75%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
7.74%
Positive growth while CRK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.22%
Margin expansion while CRK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.69%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-110.99%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.76%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-10.57%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
89.47%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CRK's 2.41%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-5.25%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.43%
EBITDA growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.86%
EBITDA margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.56%
Operating income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.22%
Operating margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-117.77%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-90.64%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-90.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.71%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-92.95%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-64.64%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-64.64%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.