PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-33.55%
Revenue decline while CRK shows 16.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-17.66%
Cost reduction while CRK shows 2.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-48.52%
Gross profit decline while CRK shows 17.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-22.54%
Margin decline while CRK shows 29.14% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.80%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-300.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.47%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.52%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
122.40%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CRK's 62.89%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-15.45%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-30.78%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.16%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of CRK's 546.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1010.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1469.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
15.24%
Other expenses growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.99%
Pre-tax income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-44.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.95%
Tax expense growth while CRK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.68%
Net income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-41.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
15.01%
EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.01%
Diluted EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.01%
Share count reduction below 50% of CRK's 0.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
11.01%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CRK's 0.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.