40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
168.96%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x CRK's 23.62%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
18.29%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRK's 1.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
2212.00%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x CRK's 64.11%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
759.62%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CRK's 70.96%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.93%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.67%
Other expenses growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.66%
Operating expenses reduction while CRK shows 1322.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.45%
Total costs growth less than half of CRK's 126.23%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-7.48%
Interest expense reduction while CRK shows 8.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.00%
D&A reduction while CRK shows 4.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
144.32%
EBITDA growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-104.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
129.91%
Operating income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
111.12%
Operating margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
260.90%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRK's 151.35%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
135.49%
Pre-tax income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
113.19%
Pre-tax margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
113.28%
Tax expense growth while CRK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
152.75%
Net income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
119.61%
Net margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
152.11%
EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
152.26%
Diluted EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.40%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x CRK's 6.37%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.99%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x CRK's 6.37%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.