40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.04%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
11.47%
Cost increase while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-35.12%
Gross profit decline while CRK shows 212.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-22.73%
Margin decline while CRK shows 216.57% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.90%
G&A reduction while CRK shows 103.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-325.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.67%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2.94%
Total costs growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.11%
Interest expense reduction while CRK shows 23.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-89.51%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
905.67%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x CRK's 156.81%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-142.19%
Operating income decline while CRK shows 94.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-150.25%
Operating margin decline while CRK shows 93.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-192.03%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-166.23%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-178.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-51.61%
Tax expense reduction while CRK shows 517.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-188.64%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-205.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-188.65%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-188.65%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.