PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-20.50%
Revenue decline while CRK shows 8.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
7.33%
Similar cost growth to CRK's 8.93%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-37.39%
Gross profit decline while CRK shows 8.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-21.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.91%
G&A growth while CRK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.26%
Other expenses reduction while CRK shows 161.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
20.68%
Operating expenses growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.52%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRK's 7.03%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
27.85%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CRK's 2.29%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
8.81%
Similar D&A growth to CRK's 8.12%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
60.69%
EBITDA growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-213.10%
EBITDA margin decline while CRK shows 1.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.25%
Operating income decline while CRK shows 6.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8666.67%
Other expenses growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
59.63%
Pre-tax income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.79%
Pre-tax margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5800.00%
Tax expense growth while CRK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.72%
Net margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.76%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.76%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.01%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x CRK's 0.32%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x CRK's 0.32%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.