PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
40.53%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x CRK's 9.63%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
13.44%
Cost increase while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
68.72%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x CRK's 45.48%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
20.06%
Margin expansion 50-75% of CRK's 32.70%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.18%
Similar G&A growth to CRK's 13.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-136.36%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.63%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRK's 13.43%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
9.60%
Total costs growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.94%
Interest expense reduction while CRK shows 4.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
15.71%
D&A growth while CRK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-39.19%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
190.42%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x CRK's 1.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6650.00%
Operating income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4760.79%
Operating margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-121.86%
Other expenses reduction while CRK shows 49.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-71.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-79.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
64.91%
Tax expense growth while CRK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-177.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-155.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-178.67%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-178.67%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.04%
Share count reduction while CRK shows 0.08% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.