40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.13%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
1.04%
Cost increase while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-45.65%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.50%
G&A growth above 1.5x CRK's 15.63%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13800.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRK's 395.45%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
29.32%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CRK's 15.63%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.60%
Total costs growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.96%
Interest expense reduction while CRK shows 3.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.09%
D&A growth while CRK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-72.90%
EBITDA decline while CRK shows 33.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-134.42%
Operating income decline while CRK shows 244.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-145.98%
Operating margin decline while CRK shows 270.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
40.68%
Other expenses growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-238.13%
Pre-tax income decline while CRK shows 17.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-284.49%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRK shows 2.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-877.78%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-200.00%
Net income decline while CRK shows 18.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-233.57%
Net margin decline while CRK shows 4.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-200.00%
EPS decline while CRK shows 20.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-198.75%
Diluted EPS decline while CRK shows 20.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.86%
Share count reduction while CRK shows 1.54% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.18%
Diluted share reduction while CRK shows 1.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.