PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.29%
Similar revenue growth to CRK's 23.92%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
25.42%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRK's 4.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.01%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRK's 54.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.39%
Margin decline while CRK shows 24.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
318.18%
G&A growth above 1.5x CRK's 32.72%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
157.14%
Other expenses growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
128.13%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CRK's 32.72%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
50.92%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRK's 5.11%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-5.43%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-21.70%
D&A reduction while CRK shows 4.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
465.75%
EBITDA growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-44.15%
EBITDA margin decline while CRK shows 4.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
132.99%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x CRK's 55.47%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
127.43%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x CRK's 25.46%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-21.57%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
120.72%
Pre-tax income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
117.22%
Pre-tax margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-528.57%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
150.33%
Net income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
141.84%
Net margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
150.21%
EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
149.15%
Diluted EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.40%
Share count increase while CRK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.39%
Diluted share increase while CRK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.