PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.20%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-6.95%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-18.65%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.71%
G&A reduction while CRK shows 52.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
96.39%
Marketing expense change of 96.39% while CRK maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
10.75%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x CRK's 8.88%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
-4.42%
Operating expenses reduction while CRK shows 52.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.72%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.67%
Interest expense reduction while CRK shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.78%
D&A growth 50-75% of CRK's 2.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-36.70%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.71%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
45.45%
Other expenses growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-59.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-57.35%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-60.51%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.19%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.13%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.95%
Share count reduction while CRK shows 0.35% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.13%
Diluted share reduction while CRK shows 0.35% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.