40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.92%
Positive growth while EQT shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.48%
Cost increase while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
1.42%
Positive growth while EQT shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.46%
Margin decline while EQT shows 54.54% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.40%
Other expenses growth less than half of EQT's 5.02%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
2.81%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of EQT's 5.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
3.86%
Total costs growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.47%
D&A reduction while EQT shows 5.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-6.50%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
27.50%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to EQT's 28.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-0.43%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.26%
Operating margin decline while EQT shows 55.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-434.26%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 11.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-50.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-51.83%
Pre-tax margin decline while EQT shows 58.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.67%
Tax expense reduction while EQT shows 5.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-57.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-58.65%
Net margin decline while EQT shows 15.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.54%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-58.75%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.43%
Share count increase while EQT reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.60%
Diluted share increase while EQT reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.