40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
26.51%
Similar revenue growth to EQT's 29.05%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
55.07%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x EQT's 44.31%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
4.70%
Gross profit growth below 50% of EQT's 12.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-17.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.81%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x EQT's 5.66%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
11.04%
Operating expenses growth less than half of EQT's 53.02%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
39.69%
Similar total costs growth to EQT's 46.49%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.34%
D&A growth above 1.5x EQT's 5.66%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
3.96%
EBITDA growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-16.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
32.40%
Operating income growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.65%
Operating margin growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7178.76%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 4.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-32.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.22%
Tax expense reduction while EQT shows 3.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.51%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.71%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.09%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.87%
Share count reduction while EQT shows 0.87% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.44%
Diluted share reduction while EQT shows 2.15% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.