40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.04%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
11.95%
Cost increase while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-10.64%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.61%
Margin decline while EQT shows 11.88% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.91%
Other expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.75%
Operating expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.04%
Total costs growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.84%
D&A growth while EQT reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.07%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.45%
EBITDA margin decline while EQT shows 436.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.50%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.47%
Operating margin decline while EQT shows 20.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-25.22%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
14.59%
Tax expense growth while EQT reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-35.24%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.91%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.22%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.58%
Share count reduction while EQT shows 0.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-7.72%
Diluted share reduction while EQT shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.