40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.16%
Positive growth while EQT shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
17.38%
Cost increase while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-17.99%
Gross profit decline while EQT shows 0.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-20.50%
Margin decline while EQT shows 9.20% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.83%
G&A change of 20.83% while EQT maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.78%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 7.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.88%
Operating expenses reduction while EQT shows 34.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.20%
Total costs growth above 1.5x EQT's 4.63%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-10.40%
Interest expense reduction while EQT shows 22.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.22%
D&A growth less than half of EQT's 7.62%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-13.25%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-57.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.70%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-86.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-87.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-78.05%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-89.54%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-89.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-90.63%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-90.63%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.03%
Share count reduction below 50% of EQT's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.