40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.23%
Positive growth while EQT shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.83%
Cost growth above 1.5x EQT's 2.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-2.71%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.70%
G&A change of 21.70% while EQT maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-233.33%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 8.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
17.32%
Operating expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.56%
Total costs growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.80%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.51%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-72.59%
Operating income decline while EQT shows 6.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-73.19%
Operating margin decline while EQT shows 9.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-574.14%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 213.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-279.14%
Pre-tax income decline while EQT shows 10.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-275.23%
Pre-tax margin decline while EQT shows 13.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
104.08%
Similar tax expense growth to EQT's 110.29%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
-233.51%
Net income decline while EQT shows 30.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-230.60%
Net margin decline while EQT shows 34.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-236.00%
EPS decline while EQT shows 28.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-236.00%
Diluted EPS decline while EQT shows 29.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.