Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-21.42%
Revenue decline while EQT shows 2.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-6.38%
Cost reduction while EQT shows 3.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-28.98%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.63%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-933.33%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 37.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-14.46%
Operating expenses reduction while EQT shows 20.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.98%
Total costs reduction while EQT shows 7.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.95%
Interest expense growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.59%
D&A reduction while EQT shows 5.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-217.47%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-57.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
45.17%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x EQT's 4.77%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
46.64%
Pre-tax income growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.10%
Pre-tax margin growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.66%
Tax expense growth less than half of EQT's 112.27%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
50.49%
Net income growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.99%
Net margin growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.61%
EPS growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.48%
Diluted EPS growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.27%
Share count reduction below 50% of EQT's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
