40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.51%
Revenue growth below 50% of EQT's 42.52%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
15.86%
Cost growth 50-75% of EQT's 22.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
3.37%
Gross profit growth below 50% of EQT's 72.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.74%
Margin decline while EQT shows 20.75% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.83%
G&A reduction while EQT shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
175.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x EQT's 18.67%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-11.33%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2.95%
Total costs growth less than half of EQT's 14.47%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.16%
Interest expense reduction while EQT shows 6.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.17%
D&A growth less than half of EQT's 89.47%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
21.09%
EBITDA growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.82%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of EQT's 48.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.63%
Operating income growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.54%
Operating margin growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-53.91%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 336.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.84%
Pre-tax income growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.31%
Pre-tax margin growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-97.61%
Tax expense reduction while EQT shows 72.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
165.94%
Net income growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
160.77%
Net margin growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
167.80%
EPS growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
167.80%
Diluted EPS growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.12%
Share count reduction while EQT shows 20.97% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while EQT shows 20.56% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.