40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.24%
Revenue growth below 50% of EQT's 18.01%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
19.71%
Cost growth above 1.5x EQT's 9.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-7.67%
Gross profit decline while EQT shows 49.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-12.27%
Margin decline while EQT shows 57.05% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.31%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-81.82%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 9.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.76%
Operating expenses reduction while EQT shows 25.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.87%
Similar total costs growth to EQT's 10.84%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
22.50%
Interest expense growth less than half of EQT's 51.51%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
16.08%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x EQT's 12.94%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
4.68%
EBITDA growth below 50% of EQT's 29.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.58%
EBITDA margin decline while EQT shows 32.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.05%
Operating income decline while EQT shows 145.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.44%
Operating margin decline while EQT shows 138.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
21.28%
Other expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.07%
Pre-tax income decline while EQT shows 41.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.55%
Pre-tax margin decline while EQT shows 50.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-112.87%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
20.83%
Net income growth below 50% of EQT's 221.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.81%
Net margin growth below 50% of EQT's 203.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.63%
EPS growth below 50% of EQT's 216.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.70%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of EQT's 211.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.74%
Share count reduction below 50% of EQT's 5.91%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
10.17%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of EQT's 14.98%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.