PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.85%
Revenue decline while EQT shows 48.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.06%
Cost reduction while EQT shows 6.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.81%
Gross profit decline while EQT shows 103.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.11%
Margin expansion below 50% of EQT's 36.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.67%
G&A growth less than half of EQT's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.91%
Other expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
64.58%
Operating expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.65%
Total costs growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.91%
Interest expense growth less than half of EQT's 17.77%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-10.52%
D&A reduction while EQT shows 5.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-55.95%
EBITDA decline while EQT shows 299.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.21%
EBITDA margin decline while EQT shows 169.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-99.62%
Operating income decline while EQT shows 377.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-99.60%
Operating margin decline while EQT shows 286.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-432.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-118.10%
Pre-tax income decline while EQT shows 242.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-119.23%
Pre-tax margin decline while EQT shows 196.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-180.39%
Tax expense reduction while EQT shows 240.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-111.83%
Net income decline while EQT shows 239.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-112.57%
Net margin decline while EQT shows 193.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-111.92%
EPS decline while EQT shows 229.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-111.46%
Diluted EPS decline while EQT shows 227.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.95%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x EQT's 7.77%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-1.40%
Diluted share reduction while EQT shows 7.67% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.