40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.64%
Revenue growth below 50% of EQT's 33.76%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
3.30%
Cost increase while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
13.14%
Gross profit growth below 50% of EQT's 57.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.15%
Margin expansion below 50% of EQT's 17.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.19%
G&A reduction while EQT shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.52%
Other expenses growth less than half of EQT's 476.64%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
20.84%
Operating expenses growth less than half of EQT's 295.42%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
12.81%
Total costs growth less than half of EQT's 97.25%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-8.49%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.68%
D&A growth above 1.5x EQT's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-36.58%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4550.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4196.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.97%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 50.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-91.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.07%
Tax expense growth while EQT reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-165.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-143.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-165.22%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-177.27%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.59%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of EQT's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
