40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-44.59%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-27.34%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-54.72%
Gross profit decline while OBE shows 95.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-18.28%
Margin decline while OBE shows 94.55% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.48%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.41%
Other expenses change of 98.41% while OBE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
1.32%
Operating expenses growth while OBE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.29%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-50.40%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.33%
D&A growth while OBE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
153.87%
EBITDA growth while OBE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
358.14%
EBITDA margin growth while OBE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-96.32%
Operating income decline while OBE shows 90.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-93.36%
Operating margin decline while OBE shows 86.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-420.16%
Other expenses reduction while OBE shows 84.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-892.24%
Pre-tax income decline while OBE shows 86.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1529.71%
Pre-tax margin decline while OBE shows 81.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-791.24%
Tax expense reduction while OBE shows 87.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-962.12%
Net income decline while OBE shows 86.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1655.82%
Net margin decline while OBE shows 81.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-940.30%
EPS decline while OBE shows 86.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-940.30%
Diluted EPS decline while OBE shows 86.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.25%
Share count reduction below 50% of OBE's 1.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
2.25%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of OBE's 1.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.