40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.64%
Positive growth while OBE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.30%
Cost increase while OBE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
13.14%
Gross profit growth below 50% of OBE's 145.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.15%
Margin expansion below 50% of OBE's 145.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.19%
G&A reduction while OBE shows 8.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.52%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x OBE's 4.55%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
20.84%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x OBE's 4.96%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.81%
Total costs growth while OBE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.49%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.68%
D&A growth while OBE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-36.58%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4550.00%
Operating income decline while OBE shows 111.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4196.17%
Operating margin decline while OBE shows 111.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.97%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-91.09%
Pre-tax income decline while OBE shows 105.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.90%
Pre-tax margin decline while OBE shows 105.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.07%
Tax expense growth less than half of OBE's 105.68%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-165.00%
Net income decline while OBE shows 105.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-143.93%
Net margin decline while OBE shows 105.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-165.22%
EPS decline while OBE shows 105.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-177.27%
Diluted EPS decline while OBE shows 105.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.59%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.04%
Diluted share increase while OBE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.