PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.92%
Positive growth while PR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.48%
Cost increase while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
1.42%
Positive growth while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.40%
Other expenses growth less than half of PR's 7.54%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
2.81%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PR's 9.60%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.86%
Total costs growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.47%
D&A reduction while PR shows 6.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-6.50%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
27.50%
EBITDA margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.43%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-434.26%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 173.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-50.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-51.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.67%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-57.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-58.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-58.54%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-58.75%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.43%
Share count increase while PR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.60%
Diluted share increase while PR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.