40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.27%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-14.19%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-18.09%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.12%
Similar other expenses growth to PR's 7.54%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
5.70%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of PR's 9.60%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-7.48%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.03%
D&A growth above 1.5x PR's 6.79%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-17.90%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.33%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.15%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 173.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-34.54%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-149.12%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-7.16%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.87%
Net margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.09%
EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.36%
Diluted EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.63%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-8.96%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.