PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.21%
Positive growth while PR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
39.02%
Cost increase while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-11.05%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.17%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 7.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-5.90%
Operating expenses reduction while PR shows 9.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
18.76%
Total costs growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.36%
Similar D&A growth to PR's 6.79%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-5.71%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.02%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-292.33%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 173.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-56.11%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-245.23%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-18.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.67%
EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.51%
Diluted EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.18%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-3.90%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.