PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.15%
Positive growth while PR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
16.28%
Cost increase while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
9.37%
Positive growth while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.25%
Other expenses growth less than half of PR's 7.54%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
19.00%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PR's 9.60%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
17.29%
Total costs growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.85%
D&A reduction while PR shows 6.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-38.64%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
16.43%
EBITDA margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.15%
Operating income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
96.83%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of PR's 173.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-63.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.53%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-68.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-71.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.71%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-68.09%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.94%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.81%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.