PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
39.61%
Positive growth while PR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-57.78%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
104.36%
Positive growth while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
46.38%
Margin expansion while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.66%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PR's 7.54%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
157.95%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PR's 9.60%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.11%
Total costs growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.52%
D&A growth 50-75% of PR's 6.79%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
53.25%
EBITDA growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
319.57%
EBITDA margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
79.08%
Operating income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.27%
Operating margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-109.18%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 173.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.34%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.50%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-37.63%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.99%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.67%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.33%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
1.66%
Diluted share increase while PR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.