40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.06%
Positive growth while PR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-6.05%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
8.02%
Positive growth while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.82%
Margin expansion while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.43%
Other expenses growth less than half of PR's 7.54%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.86%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PR's 9.60%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.25%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.13%
D&A growth less than half of PR's 6.79%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
8.16%
EBITDA growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-12.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
32.10%
Operating income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.17%
Operating margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
73.99%
Other expenses growth less than half of PR's 173.88%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
17.01%
Pre-tax income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.54%
Pre-tax margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
772.34%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-37.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.36%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.27%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.40%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-2.46%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.