40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
26.51%
Positive growth while PR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
55.07%
Cost increase while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
4.70%
Positive growth while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-17.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.81%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x PR's 7.54%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
11.04%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x PR's 9.60%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
39.69%
Total costs growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.34%
D&A growth above 1.5x PR's 6.79%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
3.96%
EBITDA growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-16.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
32.40%
Operating income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.65%
Operating margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7178.76%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 173.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-32.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.22%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-24.51%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.71%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.09%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.87%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.44%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.