40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.98%
Positive growth while PR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.84%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
25.49%
Positive growth while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
13.07%
Margin expansion while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.11%
Other expenses growth less than half of PR's 7.54%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.91%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PR's 9.60%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-0.80%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.38%
Similar D&A growth to PR's 6.79%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
29.29%
EBITDA growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
44.01%
Operating income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.76%
Operating margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
84.18%
Other expenses growth less than half of PR's 173.88%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
165.05%
Pre-tax income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
138.82%
Pre-tax margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
96.50%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
190.57%
Net income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
161.81%
Net margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
193.54%
EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
195.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.98%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-9.50%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.