40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-18.36%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
6.33%
Cost increase while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-39.33%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.18%
G&A growth above 1.5x PR's 15.75%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.88%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 7.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.01%
Operating expenses reduction while PR shows 9.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.66%
Total costs growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.19%
Interest expense growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.31%
D&A reduction while PR shows 6.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-41.75%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-66.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-59.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-74.14%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 173.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-74.24%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-68.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-71.13%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-75.16%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.07%
Share count increase while PR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.