40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.16%
Positive growth while PR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
17.38%
Cost increase while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-17.99%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.83%
G&A growth 1.25-1.5x PR's 15.75%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize overhead control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.78%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 7.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.88%
Operating expenses reduction while PR shows 9.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.20%
Total costs growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.40%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.22%
D&A growth less than half of PR's 6.79%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-13.25%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-57.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.70%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 173.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-86.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-87.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-78.05%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-89.54%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-89.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-90.63%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-90.63%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.03%
Share count increase while PR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.