40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-129.30%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-193.49%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
7.42%
Positive growth while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-466.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.41%
G&A reduction while PR shows 15.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.15%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 7.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-12.19%
Operating expenses reduction while PR shows 9.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-142.19%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
19.35%
Interest expense growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.50%
D&A reduction while PR shows 6.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
9.64%
EBITDA growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-462.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
110.61%
Operating income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-818.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
32.82%
Other expenses growth less than half of PR's 173.88%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
665.12%
Pre-tax income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2711.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1627.78%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
2444.00%
Net income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8783.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2720.00%
EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2720.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.03%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
