40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.49%
Positive growth while PR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.20%
Cost increase while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
31.21%
Positive growth while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.63%
Margin expansion while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.78%
G&A growth above 1.5x PR's 15.75%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.88%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 7.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.32%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PR's 9.60%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.27%
Total costs growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.25%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.49%
D&A reduction while PR shows 6.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-74.65%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
14.46%
EBITDA margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
134.02%
Operating income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
129.20%
Operating margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-851.22%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 173.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
148.15%
Pre-tax income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
141.33%
Pre-tax margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
199.17%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
285.71%
Net income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
259.42%
Net margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
282.76%
EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
282.76%
Diluted EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.18%
Diluted share increase while PR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.