40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
40.22%
Positive growth while PR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.84%
Cost increase while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
145.91%
Positive growth while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
75.38%
Margin expansion while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.37%
G&A growth less than half of PR's 15.75%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.12%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 7.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.24%
Operating expenses reduction while PR shows 9.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.25%
Total costs growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.70%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-4.24%
D&A reduction while PR shows 6.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
111.24%
EBITDA growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
285.95%
EBITDA margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
94.03%
Operating income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
95.74%
Operating margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-612.07%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 173.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
42.50%
Pre-tax income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.99%
Pre-tax margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.59%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.06%
Net income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.14%
Net margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.00%
EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.03%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.