40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
87.35%
Growth of 87.35% while PR shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
4.79%
Cost growth of 4.79% while PR maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
167.60%
Growth of 167.60% while PR shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
42.84%
Margin change of 42.84% while PR shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.00%
G&A reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.00%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-5.82%
Operating expenses reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.24%
Total costs reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.71%
Interest expense change of 0.71% while PR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-0.25%
D&A reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
358.30%
EBITDA change of 358.30% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
154.45%
Margin change of 154.45% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
626.67%
Income change of 626.67% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
381.12%
Margin change of 381.12% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-27.73%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
225.26%
Income change of 225.26% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
166.86%
Margin change of 166.86% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-667.44%
Tax expense reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
269.37%
Income change of 269.37% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
190.41%
Margin change of 190.41% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
267.80%
EPS change of 267.80% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
268.94%
Diluted EPS change of 268.94% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.77%
Share count change of 0.77% while PR is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-0.01%
Diluted share reduction while PR shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
