40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-29.84%
Revenue decline while PR shows 99.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.13%
Cost reduction while PR shows 34.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-38.48%
Gross profit decline while PR shows 147.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-12.32%
Margin decline while PR shows 23.91% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.11%
G&A growth less than half of PR's 46.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.18%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PR's 36.26%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
0.08%
Total costs growth less than half of PR's 35.55%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1.42%
Interest expense change of 1.42% while PR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-1.52%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-43.56%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.06%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-64.46%
Operating margin decline while PR shows 35.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
80.92%
Other expenses growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-71.40%
Pre-tax income decline while PR shows 307.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-59.24%
Pre-tax margin decline while PR shows 203.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
79.92%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x PR's 41.39%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-74.25%
Net income decline while PR shows 275.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-63.29%
Net margin decline while PR shows 187.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-74.75%
EPS decline while PR shows 274.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-74.75%
Diluted EPS decline while PR shows 274.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.30%
Share count change of 0.30% while PR is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.30%
Diluted share change of 0.30% while PR is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.