40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
32.96%
Similar revenue growth to PR's 35.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
23.09%
Cost increase while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
39.42%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of PR's 56.60%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
4.86%
Margin expansion below 50% of PR's 15.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.91%
G&A reduction while PR shows 104.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.00%
Other expenses change of 75.00% while PR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-15.26%
Operating expenses reduction while PR shows 154.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.51%
Total costs growth less than half of PR's 93.20%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.76%
Interest expense change of 5.76% while PR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
7.73%
D&A growth 50-75% of PR's 11.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
155.04%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x PR's 25.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
98.85%
EBITDA margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
855.56%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x PR's 28.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
618.69%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x PR's 47.49%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.86%
Other expenses growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
157.83%
Pre-tax income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
143.50%
Pre-tax margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1300.00%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x PR's 62.50%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
146.22%
Net income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
134.76%
Net margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
147.06%
EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
147.06%
Diluted EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.37%
Share count change of 0.37% while PR is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.37%
Diluted share change of 0.37% while PR is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.