40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
43.89%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PR's 6.42%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
68.17%
Cost increase while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
30.11%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x PR's 20.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-9.58%
Margin decline while PR shows 13.47% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.85%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7262.50%
Other expenses change of 7262.50% while PR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-6.82%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
27.29%
Total costs growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.02%
Interest expense change of 9.02% while PR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
19.00%
D&A growth less than half of PR's 105.82%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
5.49%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PR's 260.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
130.06%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of PR's 239.10%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
108.64%
Operating income growth below 50% of PR's 703.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
45.00%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PR's 667.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1768.97%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PR's 809.27%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
528.07%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x PR's 400.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
336.49%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to PR's 382.31%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
159.17%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
935.79%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x PR's 366.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
619.84%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x PR's 350.78%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
104.86%
EPS growth below 50% of PR's 366.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
104.86%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PR's 366.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.01%
Share count change of 0.01% while PR is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.01%
Diluted share change of 0.01% while PR is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.