40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-33.55%
Revenue decline while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-17.66%
Cost reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-48.52%
Gross profit decline while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-22.54%
Margin decline while PR shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.80%
G&A reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-300.00%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.47%
Operating expenses reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.52%
Total costs reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
122.40%
Interest expense change of 122.40% while PR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-15.45%
D&A reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-30.78%
EBITDA decline while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.16%
Margin change of 4.16% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-1010.00%
Operating income decline while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1469.39%
Operating margin decline while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
15.24%
Other expenses change of 15.24% while PR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
3.99%
Income change of 3.99% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-44.47%
Pre-tax margin decline while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.95%
Tax expense change of 0.95% while PR maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
5.68%
Income change of 5.68% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-41.93%
Net margin decline while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
15.01%
EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.01%
Diluted EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.01%
Share count increase while PR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.01%
Diluted share increase while PR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.