40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-26.96%
Revenue decline while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-13.14%
Cost reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-36.13%
Gross profit decline while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-12.55%
Margin decline while PR shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.85%
G&A reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
448.00%
Other expenses change of 448.00% while PR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
6.04%
Operating expenses change of 6.04% while PR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-2.64%
Total costs reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.83%
Interest expense reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.43%
D&A reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
58.42%
EBITDA change of 58.42% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
142.72%
Margin change of 142.72% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-206.50%
Operating income decline while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-245.82%
Operating margin decline while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
131.19%
Other expenses change of 131.19% while PR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
30.40%
Income change of 30.40% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
4.70%
Margin change of 4.70% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
17.53%
Tax expense change of 17.53% while PR maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
38.07%
Income change of 38.07% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
15.21%
Margin change of 15.21% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
38.02%
EPS change of 38.02% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
38.57%
Diluted EPS change of 38.57% while PR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-0.10%
Share count reduction while PR shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.81%
Diluted share change of 0.81% while PR is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.