40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-51.66%
Revenue decline while PR shows 54.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.04%
Cost reduction while PR shows 8.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-93.69%
Gross profit decline while PR shows 76.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-86.94%
Margin decline while PR shows 14.18% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.36%
G&A reduction while PR shows 575.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-127.59%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-14.04%
Operating expenses reduction while PR shows 575.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.41%
Total costs reduction while PR shows 575.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.88%
Interest expense growth less than half of PR's 9.57%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-11.88%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-131.33%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-226.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-575.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-142.98%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-57.06%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-224.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.15%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-58.58%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-228.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-57.78%
EPS decline while PR shows 1.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.74%
Diluted EPS decline while PR shows 1.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.51%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x PR's 13.03%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.