40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
88.67%
Positive growth while PR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.04%
Cost growth less than half of PR's 12.52%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
189.76%
Positive growth while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
53.58%
Margin expansion while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.18%
G&A reduction while PR shows 9.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-200.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-26.34%
Operating expenses reduction while PR shows 1.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.15%
Total costs reduction while PR shows 10.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.52%
Interest expense reduction while PR shows 35.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.29%
D&A reduction while PR shows 22.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
259.24%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x PR's 5.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
111.54%
EBITDA margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1037.82%
Operating income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
503.08%
Operating margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-136.49%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 51.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2520.00%
Pre-tax income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1288.68%
Pre-tax margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2383.33%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
2541.03%
Net income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1299.82%
Net margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2595.00%
EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2595.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.18%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.